Herewith this email from Star Eagle concerning the upcoming appearance Thursday on “Con Games” on KNFO of Darryl Donnelly, the eyewitness to the Pentagon crash on 9/11 whose photographs have been seen around the world:
Greetings Michael,
I am glad to hear that you are going to have your bud on next Thursday to debunk all these crazy conspiracy nuts for brains.
However, Michael…have you bothered to even try and watch the movie that I have recomended you actually SEE for yourself before you bring in your expert.
Please remember Michael I was right in your camp saying essentially what you are now saying because I too was of the opinion that there was no way it could have been anything else. The only thing that could change my mind was if I saw something that really chalenged my high B.S. standards.
I have now seen that Michael, and yes, I still agree that those passenger planes were hijacked and they did fly into the buildings and they were hijacked by TERRORIST. By terrorist, I mean those mostly Saudi men that we were told were the hijackers.
And yes Michael, I do beileve that your friend did see a plane fly over his head and that it was that plane that did hit the Pentagon.
These (and many more) are not facts that I dispute.
But Michael there is far more to this picture than those facts and you need to look into this a bit deeper before you judge that bigger picture.
You are a N.Y. boy. You know how much more complex that site and this issue really are. If you watch the vidio (9/11 Mysteries) I write about you will see for yourself that there were other factors involved beyond the stated fact that the terrorist were still going to attack the Trade Towers after the 1993 bombing. I for one, already knew that because I had read it in the newspapers sometime between the years 1993 and 2001 (1998 maybe) that the terrorist still had those Towers in their sights. I said to myself that “they will hit them again”. I just never expected the spectacular results that follewed.
But it is much more than this that I see Michael. One example, we have all seen the footage of Bush being told that indeed a second plane had hit the South Tower. The look on his face and his lack of action has always bothered me. I just have a hard time not feeling that something is just not right in his response, or lack thereof. Now this is an example of my personal feelings on this but then we come to actual footage of people right there at that time and place (the streets of N.Y.-9/11). They are saying that they were hearing explosions in the buildings and you have people in the building talking about things going on in the days before hand that were very suspicious, especially considering the way the Towers ended up falling.
And Michael there is much much more. Too much to just ignore. At least I can’t. Especially for me because I am aware of the, what you could possibly call, conspiricies involved in the rebuilding effort. But you have to see this vidio and the evidence it presents before you really know what I mean.
Now, it looks like I am going to be on the road next Thursday and will miss your show so all I can do is ask you to at least watch this vidio (9/11 Mysteries) for yourself before you further slam all the conspiracy theories and, I might add, theorist.
I am not saying that I am right for sure on this conspiracy thing Michael but I am informed enough to know that it is possible and that if it is true it would go far in explaining things like “why did Cheney change his tune since Desert Storm and his perception of what would happen then in Iraq (1991) if we kicked Saddam out of there and hung his sorry ass and now, when that is exactally what he has endorsed since taking over the vice-presidency”. Now those might not have been your exact words I heard this morning but, coming from my conspiracy theorist mind, that is essentially what I heard. Yes, I do have a (warped) sense of humor.
Anyway Michael, I could go on and on and in time you will hear much more, but enough for now, and untill I hear from you that you have indeed watched the above mentioned vidio I am afraid that I have to call it as you call it when you stand up for your bud who saw the plane and…you know what I mean.
Get ahold of me and I can get you the disc to watch as I really don’t recomend watching it over the internet.
When I read Star’s posts, why do the words from that song “Who’s watching me” always pop into my head….
“…When I come home at night
I bolt the door real tight
People call me on the phone
I’m trying to avoid
But can the people on TV see me
Or am I just paranoid
When I’m in the shower
I’m afraid to wash my hair
‘Cause I might open my eyes
And find someone standing there
People say I’m crazy
Just a little touched
But maybe showers remind me
Of Psycho too much
That’s why…”
When I read Star’s posts, why do the words from that song “Who’s watching me” always pop into my head….
“…When I come home at night
I bolt the door real tight
People call me on the phone
I’m trying to avoid
But can the people on TV see me
Or am I just paranoid
When I’m in the shower
I’m afraid to wash my hair
‘Cause I might open my eyes
And find someone standing there
People say I’m crazy
Just a little touched
But maybe showers remind me
Of Psycho too much
That’s why…”
The whole subject of 9/11 conspiracy theory is a non-starter for me.
To paraphrase Christopher Hitchens, to describe this thinking as a turd would be to run the risk of a discourse that would never again rise above the excremental…
Cheers,
The whole subject of 9/11 conspiracy theory is a non-starter for me.
To paraphrase Christopher Hitchens, to describe this thinking as a turd would be to run the risk of a discourse that would never again rise above the excremental…
Cheers,
With all due respect, Alpha6, isn’t a comment that cites a Michael Jackson lyric sufficient evidence that blogging is not journalism?
Cheers,
With all due respect, Alpha6, isn’t a comment that cites a Michael Jackson lyric sufficient evidence that blogging is not journalism?
Cheers,
Mitch, Couldn’t agree with you more on the 9/11 conspiracy thing…
The correct title of the song is “Somebody’s watching me” by Roxwell, with guest vocals from Michael and Jermaine Jackson.
It’s just that every time I hear about another of these 9/11 conspiracies I tend to believe that people are looking for things that are not there…hence the song.
Mitch, Couldn’t agree with you more on the 9/11 conspiracy thing…
The correct title of the song is “Somebody’s watching me” by Roxwell, with guest vocals from Michael and Jermaine Jackson.
It’s just that every time I hear about another of these 9/11 conspiracies I tend to believe that people are looking for things that are not there…hence the song.
I’m surprised to see no response on the blog tonight about to Daryl Donley’s appearance on Con-games this morning. If you missed it, you truly have something to lament.
That was easily the best radio segment Michael has ever done. Easily.
After hearing that some of Donley’s photos of the Pentagon on 9/11 were on the Library of Congress website, I browsed there and found a panel discussion of 9/11 photographers on which Donley participated. If you missed Con-games this morning, point your browser here:
http://www.loc.gov/locvideo/911photo/
You will see Donley’s photos of that fateful day, and you’ll hear much of the story he told this morning.
Cheers,
I’m surprised to see no response on the blog tonight about to Daryl Donley’s appearance on Con-games this morning. If you missed it, you truly have something to lament.
That was easily the best radio segment Michael has ever done. Easily.
After hearing that some of Donley’s photos of the Pentagon on 9/11 were on the Library of Congress website, I browsed there and found a panel discussion of 9/11 photographers on which Donley participated. If you missed Con-games this morning, point your browser here:
http://www.loc.gov/locvideo/911photo/
You will see Donley’s photos of that fateful day, and you’ll hear much of the story he told this morning.
Cheers,
Hey, hey,
I’m back! Sorry I missed the big show but I was on a little road trip back East and got a taste of some of the “States of the Union” first-hand. Very interesting!!! But more on all of that later.
Now its back to this “conspiracy thing”.
First, I do believe that a plane hit the Pentagon and I do believe two planes hit the Twin Towers and I do believe a plane went down in a Pennsylvania field. And I believe those planes were indeed the hijacked planes we were told they were.
However, the picture is much bigger than this, and much deeper too.
That is why I ask you to look into this on a deeper level and then, I believe, you will begin to see what I see.
Mitch, you wrote you would look into seeing the vidio I recomended (back in Dec) sometime after the New Year.
Well.., good news. Over here in the Vail valley we are going to be having a weekly vidio nite where we will be showing quite a number of these kinds of vidios.
These vidios will be shown in a public forum and I am now working out those details. I will soon let you know more about how you can see them in this context or if you prefer I will also try and get you info as to how you can see them in your home.
You too alpha6.
You two are too sharp to hide from knowledge.
That goes for you too Con-Man. Star Eagle
Hey, hey,
I’m back! Sorry I missed the big show but I was on a little road trip back East and got a taste of some of the “States of the Union” first-hand. Very interesting!!! But more on all of that later.
Now its back to this “conspiracy thing”.
First, I do believe that a plane hit the Pentagon and I do believe two planes hit the Twin Towers and I do believe a plane went down in a Pennsylvania field. And I believe those planes were indeed the hijacked planes we were told they were.
However, the picture is much bigger than this, and much deeper too.
That is why I ask you to look into this on a deeper level and then, I believe, you will begin to see what I see.
Mitch, you wrote you would look into seeing the vidio I recomended (back in Dec) sometime after the New Year.
Well.., good news. Over here in the Vail valley we are going to be having a weekly vidio nite where we will be showing quite a number of these kinds of vidios.
These vidios will be shown in a public forum and I am now working out those details. I will soon let you know more about how you can see them in this context or if you prefer I will also try and get you info as to how you can see them in your home.
You too alpha6.
You two are too sharp to hide from knowledge.
That goes for you too Con-Man. Star Eagle
Hey all,
conspiracies exist and so do coincidences. When it comes to human actions, discussions are the rule, if those discussions involve skulduggery they are considered conspiracies. Asteroid and cometary impacts are coincidental, you don’t know when they are going to hit.
The question is what did the president know and when did he know it. I think he did know something non specific was going to happen and they did nothing to ferret out the specifics for the public.
Hey all,
conspiracies exist and so do coincidences. When it comes to human actions, discussions are the rule, if those discussions involve skulduggery they are considered conspiracies. Asteroid and cometary impacts are coincidental, you don’t know when they are going to hit.
The question is what did the president know and when did he know it. I think he did know something non specific was going to happen and they did nothing to ferret out the specifics for the public.
Star Eagle,
Send me a link to these “vidios” on the internet, and I’ll make good on my agreement to watch.
Do I have better things to do? Certainly. But there’s always the possibility that said videos will be as amusing as Benny Hill re-runs.
Any chance you’d be mensch enough to view videos I recommend?
Cheers,
Star Eagle,
Send me a link to these “vidios” on the internet, and I’ll make good on my agreement to watch.
Do I have better things to do? Certainly. But there’s always the possibility that said videos will be as amusing as Benny Hill re-runs.
Any chance you’d be mensch enough to view videos I recommend?
Cheers,