“Ohm, ohm, diversity is not our strength. Ohm, ohm. La diversidad no es fuerza. Ohm, ohm. Too much diversity is distructive. Ohm, ohm. Celebrate homogenity.”
The FBI now acknowledges the U.S. is occupied by a disparate standing army of 1,000,000 thugs, punks and gangsters. “Criminal gangs,” the feds say, “commit as much as 80 percent of the crime in many communities…throughout the nation. Typical gang-related crimes include alien smuggling, armed robbery, assault, auto theft, drug trafficking, extortion, fraud, home invasions, identity theft, murder, and weapons trafficking.
“Ohm, ohm. Diversity is not our strength.”
And in California, the most “diverse” (and dysfunctional) state in the nation, you’d damn well better not be living-while-black (LWB), or you shall receive (one-sided) diversity justice.
|
|||||
A Latino street gang waged a racist campaign to eliminate the city’s black residents through attempted murders and other crimes, according to federal racketeering indictments unsealed Thursday….Gang members have expressed a desire to rid the city of Hawaiian Gardens of all African-Americans and have engaged in a systematic effort to achieve that result by perpetrating crimes against African-Americans…. The indictments mark at least the second time in less than two years that federal authorities have accused Latino gang members of attacking black residents because of their race.
“Ohm, ohm. La diversidad no es fuerza”
And don’t miss viewing this report (100 Alleged Gang Members Arrested), tellingly the only one of the many reporting on the racial cleansing of black Americans by foreign criminals that included (dare it be said) the “illegal alien” factor:
A 193-page federal indictment…also alleges they engaged in a systematic effort to drive African-Americans out of this one square mile community in southern Los Angeles. …Immigration and Customs Enforcement says at least eight of those arrested have previous convictions for illegal re-entry into the United States following deportation. Several others are illegal aliens.
“Ohm, ohm. La diversidad no es fuerza. Ohm. Ohm”
Also check out this from USA Today: MS-13 far-flung from L.A. incubator
One group that continues to spread despite law enforcement efforts is the violent Salvadoran gang known as MS-13….Michael Sullivan, the departing director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, says the gang’s dependence on shocking violence to advance extortion, prostitution and other criminal enterprises has frustrated attempts to infiltrate and disrupt the insular group’s activities. Davidson County, Tenn., Sheriff Daron Hall, whose jurisdiction includes Nashville, says MS-13 started growing there about five years ago, corresponding with an influx of immigrant labor. Last April, county officials began checking the immigration status of all arrestees. “We know we have removed about 100 gang members, including MS-13,” to U.S. authorities for deportation, Hall says…[A] revolving door on the border has kept the gang’s numbers steady…even as many illegal immigrant members are deported.
And for all you amnesty cheerleaders out there, you should know that the last attempted (failed) congressional amnesty cram-down provided for putting illegal-alien gangbangers on a pathway to U.S. citizenship if they would–get this–”renounce their gang memberships.” Yep, I can just see an illegal-alien MS-13 gangster before of a U.S. Citzenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) adjucator: Ah, OK, I hereby renounce my gang membership. Now make me a citizen or I’ll cut off your cajones!
Oh, but what about those gangbanging foreign criminals who are “doing the work Americans won’t do?” There is a rhetorical question ofter posed by gang experts: “What do illegal-alien gangbangers do when thay aren’t gangbanging. (Hint: They go to their jobs.)
“Ohm, ohm. Diversdity is not our strength. Ohm, ohm. La diversidad no es fuerza. Ohm. Ohm. Too much diversity is divisive, distructive and deadly . Celebrate homogeneity. Ohm. ohm.”
Maybe you don’t get the fact that gang-banging makes more money and easier then anything else they could be doing. These gangs are not sophisticated, mobster want-to-be. They are ruthless, violent, but very profitable. They have no reason to get jobs. They don’t need nor want to cover up their activities. When you imply that the Latinos working real jobs are the same that are gang-banging, you are not only taking away well deserved credit from those with jobs, but you labeling all Latinos by the worse of them. This is racism. A charge I’m sure you don’t take seriously but it is.
When you grow up seeing the richest people in your neighborhood are all gang-bangers it makes getting a labor intensive job for $7.25/ hour that much harder. So give credit to those who chose poverty and hard work over easier money. If you look at your numbers you will so the fault in what your saying. 1,000,000 gangster, of that how many are Latinos? And then find how many Latinos are in United States. Compare those numbers and you’ll see how absurd it is to lump the millions of Latinos living in America under the thousands of Latino gang members. If you can make that stretch then I can lump you with your Caucasian counterpart the Nazi’s or how ’bout defining you by Manson’s actions.
Neanderthal wrote: “If you look at your [FBI] numbers, you will so the fault in what your saying.”
Anyone who writes such a pathetically juvenile sentence is not worth responding to, except to say:
1. “so” probably was meant to be “see”
2. “your” probably was meant to be “you’re”)
“pathetically juvenile sentence” Come on! Just one sentence, I’m sure you could find more, a lot more. Focusing on other peoples mistakes always helps me ignore things I don’t want to hear too. I understand Mike. Ignorance is bliss. It is interesting though, you took the time to make it read the way it should, yet you still can’t comprehend it.
Neanderthal wrote: “Come on! Just one sentence, I’m sure you could find more, a lot more.’
Yep! Take this gem: “They don’t need nor want to cover up their activities.”
Rewrite:They (neither) need nor want to cover up their activities.
Or this insult to written English: :
“Maybe you don’t get the fact that gang-banging makes more money and easier then anything else they could be doing.”
Rewrite: “Maybe you don’t get the fact that
[gangbanging generates] more money and [is] easier than working for a living.”
Rules: Do not hypenate (compound) a non-hypenated noun (“gangbanging), especially when it is not followed by a noun.
Rule: Do not us the verb “gangbanging” and then–in the same friggin sentence–use the pornoun “they” to refer back to the verb, “gangbanging,” Dude, it just does not make sense.
You and Ed Troy need to sigh up for a CMC remedial writing course–or two, or three, or…..
I am under educated which reflects heavily in my writing. My vocabulary is sad at best. I can not disagree with you because all your doing in pointing out the flaws in my English. I’m sure, even as I’m writing now, you could find at least ten mistakes. I can remember a conscious decision I made to stop learning English in the forth grade. I was told I had a sixth grade reading level which statistically meant I could read most news papers. I thought that was good enough and so I stop caring about any of my English lessons. Unfortunately I was able to get away with this because of computers and their auto correct. It is a decision I have always regretted.
I sorry to tell you my friend, but my writing skills are a dime a dozen now days and it’s getting worse. Computers have promoted a laziness that has gone viral. The only good news that I can give you is that the main purpose of writing is communication. The very fact that you are able to correct my writing means that I have painfully conveyed my message. I am sorry that it is so painful, but unfortunately it is the common practice. English is dying. LOL, BRB, NASL, NP… Do u no that this is what teachers r receiving n papers?
I enjoy reading your well written blogs, especially the clever metaphors. But keep in mind, just because it is well written or even intelligent, it is not necessarily right. Ignorance can be hidden by intelligence. Maybe your focusing on the beauty of writing instead of focusing on content. What I wrote is ignorant and even insulting to English. What you wrote is ignorant to humanity and racist.
Neanderthal clumsily wrote: “What you wrote is ignorant to humanity and racist”.
I went to Saint Joseph’s (grade) school, in California. At that time Saint Joseph’s mostly was made up of pupils of Irish and Mexican heritage. My two best friends then were Carlos Hermosillo and Ronnie Morales. To this day we meet every couple of years in California to reacquaint and reminisce. Carlos and Ronnie were the two toughest guys I’ve ever known, brawlers extraordinaire. Carlos won the All Marine completion when he was in the Marine Corp while stationed at Camp Pendleton. Ronnie, even to this day, is a major bad ass. Both are second-generation Americans. They both loath illegal immigration.
A few years ago I told Carlos and Ronnie about some of the weenies in the Roaring Fork valley who are quick to refer to me as a racist. Only half kiddingly, they said that some day they wanted to come and visit me, at which time I could point out for them those whose slander and bravado deserved their ass-kicking attention. I would be more than happy to put you on the Carlos/Ronnie hit list, Please do let me know, but Lord help you if your choice is as bad as your writing.
Australopithecus wrote “Neanderthal.”
Cheers,
Other than my terrible writing, is your point: Shut up or I’ll have you beat up? That’s manly. I will continue calling you a racist if you continue saying racist things. Even though I’m sure you’re developing your opinion out of ignorance more then hate, it’s racist. I love the classics. “I’m not racist; I have colored friends.” Good job of evading the point again.
Australopithecus wrote “Neanderthal.”
As far thinking goes, Australopithecus is a pithecanthropus by another name.
Mc Garry,
Surely there must be a place where a test of manhood can be done. No pansy pie throwing.
Mr. Mc Garry,
My husband Edward Troy had me read these blogs. I had to laugh at how you criticized Ed and Nathan for misspelled words but didn’t use spell check yourself.
Take a look at some of your sentences:
It should be “pronoun” not pornoun.
It should be ” sign” not sigh.
You should really concentrate more on the substance of the content of what is being said ,and not on how things are misspelled. This is just a Blog. This is not an English class.
Oh, by the way, if anyone is going to get the chance to throw a pie in Mr. Troy’s face and get away with it…it is going to be me.
Ha Ha
Judy
use the pornoun “they” to refer back to the verb, “gangbanging,” Dude, it just does not make sense.
You and Ed Troy need to sigh up for a CMC remedial writing course–or two, or three, or…..
Dear Nathan,
I believe you are accepting an awful mistake when you wrote the following;
[I am under educated which reflects heavily in my writing. My vocabulary is sad at best. I can not disagree with you because all your doing in pointing out the flaws in my English. I’m sure, even as I’m writing now, you could find at least ten mistakes. I can remember a conscious decision I made to stop learning English in the forth grade. I was told I had a sixth grade reading level which statistically meant I could read most news papers. I thought that was good enough and so I stop caring about any of my English lessons. Unfortunately I was able to get away with this because of computers and their auto correct. It is a decision I have always regretted.]
Clear minded thinking is not a result of degrees or spell check. I can assure you that your thinking is logical, coherent and cogent; even when I disagree with you on some points. I am certain that most of the other civil bloggers would add to that assurance. I am glad you are joining the civil part of this blogosphere. There are a few of us.
Mc Garry is nothing more than a loudmouth jerk and he is apparently ready willing and able to hand off any a-kicking to his friends. He will not step in a ring, cage or on a mat, but he will continue to call you, me and others silly schoolyard names, since his arguments are too weak to defend. He used to be on Congames Wednesdays. I used to call in and ask why didn’t he look at multi variable solutions especially economic solutions to immigration. His answer was the same tired crap, ‘lets just build that fence’. I accused him of making a living off that issue, without really trying to solve the problem. He claimed that wasn’t the case.
I’m sure Tom Tancredo is his hero, or at least in his pantheon of demigods.
Mc Garry gets on some popular band wagon issue and defends it with all the expertise of a caged parrot. I would prefer that he challenge the bloggers with information, instead of simple minded epithets. I offered to arm wrestle him for a beer, we could play a chess game, but he wants to be what he is. Aping a Pithecanthropus, has revealed Mc Garry to be the intellectual progeny of an old Piltdown friend or just a regular old homo erectum.
By the way Mc Garry Neanderthal is now more generally spelled Neandertal. Get that education son, you too can evolve.
Ed-
Mike is nothing if not consistent. Apparently, criticizing an opponent’s grammar and usage is a favorite form of argumentation. While this does little to undermine the view of his opponent, it does absolutely nothing to support his own, particularly when, as the fetching Mrs. Troy points out, he has a few planks to remove from his own eye.
What’s more rhetorically ineffective than attacking a person’s writing? I’ve been a student of speech and composition since 1979, and from that time until now, I’ve never read a more feckless argument than, “be careful or I’ll put you on Vinny the Wag’s ass-kicking list.” That’s even more effete than Muammar Gaddafi drawing the “line of death” in the Gulf of Sidra.
I only read Mike’s post/comments to gather context for Nathan’s. I don’t always agree with Nathan, but I find his voice more credible.
Cheers,
I only read Mike’s post/comments to gather context for Nathan’s. I don’t always agree with Nathan, but I find his voice more credible.
Cheers,
Far more insightful, credible and enlightened.
I’ve been a student of speech and composition since 1979, and from that time until now, I’ve never read a more feckless argument than, “be careful or I’ll put you on Vinny the Wag’s ass-kicking list.” That’s even more effete than Muammar Gaddafi drawing the “line of death” in the Gulf of Sidra.
Holy s–t I remember laughing when he said that too!!
Ok this line, well I meant this one. Ok my big brother is going to kick your ass. I guess his testosterone doesn’t match his bluster. I guess they can let the pansies lead their dances.